Skip to content

For Engineering Managers

Know which teams thrive with AI — before they tell you.

Some teams ship 2x more with AI. Others burn licenses. Scout shows you which is which — and what high-performing teams do differently.

Team comparison dashboard showing AI adoption and throughput by engineering team

What You Can See

Deep visibility into how AI is working across your teams without micromanaging.

Team-level Drill-downs

Compare adoption, velocity, quality, and cost per team with 2-level deep breakdowns. See which teams are thriving and which need support.

Bottleneck Detection

See where delays shifted post-AI. Coding time may be down, but has the bottleneck moved to review or testing? Scout surfaces the shift.

Sprint Intelligence

AI-attributed ticket data shows which work types benefit most from AI assistance. Focus AI investment on high-impact areas.

From Signals to Action

Ask a question, get an investigation. Scout walks you through the data to find answers, not just charts.

Comparing Team Adoption Patterns

Platform team: 82% active AI users, avg 4.2 sessions/day. Mobile team: 34% active users, avg 0.8 sessions/day.

Gap: 2.4x adoption difference

Analyzing Productivity Correlation

Platform: cycle time down 28%, PR throughput up 45%. Mobile: cycle time down 4%, PR throughput flat. Strong adoption-velocity correlation.

High adopters: 5.8x more velocity gains

Checking Root Cause Signals

Mobile team survey: "AI tools don't support Swift well" (72%), "No time for setup" (58%). Platform team had structured onboarding.

Barrier: Tooling fit + onboarding gap

AI is reshaping your workforce.
Are you measuring what’s changing?

Start with a discovery call. We’ll show you how Larridin gives you complete visibility into your AI transformation in minutes, not months.