Deep visibility into how AI is working across your teams
— without micromanaging.
Compare adoption, velocity, quality, and cost per team with 2-level deep breakdowns. See which teams are thriving and which need support.
See where delays shifted post-AI. Coding time may be down, but has the bottleneck moved to review or testing? Scout surfaces the shift.
AI-attributed ticket data shows which work types benefit most from AI assistance. Focus AI investment on high-impact areas.
Ask a question, get an investigation. Scout walks you through the data to find answers, not just charts.
Platform team: 82% active AI users, avg 4.2 sessions/day. Mobile team: 34% active users, avg 0.8 sessions/day.
Gap: 2.4x adoption difference
Platform: cycle time down 28%, PR throughput up 45%. Mobile: cycle time down 4%, PR throughput flat. Strong adoption-velocity correlation.
High adopters: 5.8x more velocity gains
Mobile team survey: "AI tools don't support Swift well" (72%), "No time for setup" (58%). Platform team had structured onboarding.
Barrier: Tooling fit + onboarding gap
Mobile team has low adoption due to language support gaps and missing onboarding.
Recommend: add Claude Code (strong Swift support), replicate Platform’s onboarding playbook.
Projected impact: +35% CAT gain within 60 days.
Mobile team has low adoption due to language support gaps and missing onboarding.
Recommend: add Claude Code (strong Swift support), replicate Platform’s onboarding playbook.
Projected impact: +35% CAT gain within 60 days.