Skip to content
Get Pricing Try Now

Prove AI’s return. Across every team, engineer and agent.

Larridin measures developer productivity and agent effectiveness from your code, CI/CD, incidents and coding agents. It tracks every AI dollar in the company, and its router starts cutting token spend right away.

Try Larridin How Larridin compares with DX
  • Every teamEngineering, sales, support, finance
  • People and agentsDevin, Claude Code, Codex, Cursor
  • Spend tracked, then cutThe right model for every prompt
Larridin Token and Spend Insights: all-in AI spend split across agent usage, human usage and fixed licences Larridin AI ROI: AI spend, hours returned per week and return on AI spend, with hours by department
Larridin routerlive
  • Refactor auth middlewarefrontier
  • Rename across filessmall
  • Summarise pull requestsmall

Side by side

Larridin vs DX at a glance

DX was built on developer surveys before coding agents arrived, and is now part of Atlassian. Larridin was built for AI-native engineering: people and agents, every AI dollar, and every team beyond engineering.

“Not shown” means we found no public evidence either way. Every claim links to a source at the foot of this page.

Larridin vs DX capabilities
Capability Larridin DX
Scope
Measures AI across the whole companySales, support, finance and every other team Yes No Engineering only
AI spend outside engineeringChatGPT Enterprise, M365 Copilot, Gemini and business agents Yes No
Workforce
Developer productivity and SDLC telemetryVersion control, CI/CD and project management Yes Yes
Agents measured alongside engineersDevin, Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and more Yes Not shown Mentioned in marketing, no product detail
Reliability, incidents and alertsIncident, on-call and alerting systems Yes Yes PagerDuty
Spend and action
Engineering AI token spendBy team, tool, model and agent Yes Not shown
Intelligent model routerSends each prompt to the right model automatically Yes No
Platform
Built AI-firstDesigned for AI-native engineering from day one Yes No Developer experience surveys, AI added later
PricingAs published or reported From $25,000 a year Annual enterprise contract Not published Median contract about $54K a year (Vendr)

Where Larridin goes further

Built for AI-native work, across the whole company

01

AI’s return across every team, not only engineering

Engineering is often around 15% of headcount. Larridin measures AI use, time saved and outcomes in sales, support, finance and every other team, next to engineering, so the CFO sees one answer.

Compared with DX: DX measures engineering only.

Larridin department leaderboard: AI adoption, fluency, hours returned per week and cost per AI hour for every department
02

Engineers and agents, measured as one workforce

Larridin reads Devin, Claude Code, Codex and Cursor next to version control, CI/CD, incidents and alerts. You see where work stalls across the SDLC and which fixes speed up people and agents alike.

Compared with DX: DX’s public materials show no dedicated view of agents as workers.

Larridin Agent Traces: coding-agent sessions scored on one rubric, with the evidence behind each score
03

Every AI dollar tracked, then cut

See spend by team, tool, model and agent, reconciled to invoices. The Larridin router sends each prompt to the right model automatically, so token savings start right away.

Compared with DX: DX has no model router and shows no dedicated token spend view.

Larridin Router impact: dollars saved against pinned cost, and where AI coding work ran
Larridin routerlast 3 prompts
  • Refactor the auth middlewarefrontier
  • Rename a variable across filessmall
  • Summarise this pull requestsmall

Pricing

One contract instead of three

Most teams stitch together an engineering intelligence tool, an AI spend tool and a model router, and still can’t see beyond engineering.

Engineering intelligence
DX: not published
AI spend and FinOps across the company
A separate tool
Intelligent model router
Not offered by DX
Larridin

From $25,000 a year

Annual enterprise contract. Developer productivity, agent effectiveness, AI spend and the router, for engineering and every other team.

Get pricing

Trusted by AI-forward enterprises

  • Vertiv
  • OK! magazine
  • Gainsight
  • The Signatry
  • Klaviyo
  • SurveyMonkey
  • Globality
  • TigerConnect
  • ConnectPay
  • The Joint Chiropractic
  • EcoVadis
  • Sundt
  • Polk County, WI
  • Source Advisors
  • Andelyn Biosciences
  • University of Hertfordshire

Enterprise ready

SOC 2
Type II
HIPAA
Compliant
GDPR
Compliant
Cloud
Managed by Larridin
On-prem
In your data center
BYOC
Bring your own cloud

Questions

Larridin and DX, answered

Is Larridin a replacement for DX?

Yes, but many teams run both. DX covers developer sentiment, and Larridin adds telemetry, agents, AI spend, the router and every team across the organization, not just engineering.

Does Larridin measure AI outside engineering?

Yes. Larridin measures AI use, spend and outcomes in every team, from sales and support to finance, next to engineering.

Which coding agents does Larridin measure?

Devin, Claude Code, Codex and Cursor, alongside version control, CI/CD, incident and alerting systems. Please check out our integrations page for the latest.

How is Larridin priced?

Annual enterprise contracts start at $25,000 a year, we price it both based on usage and seats.

How did you compare DX?

From DX’s public website, documentation and third-party reviews, checked September 2026. Sources are listed below. Where we found no evidence either way, the table says “Not shown”.

Sources for the DX column, checked September 2026

  1. getdx.com
  2. getdx.com/news/introducing-the-dx-core-4
  3. atlassian.com/blog/announcements/atlassian-acquires-dx
  4. vendr.com/marketplace/dx

Spotted something out of date? Email hello@larridin.com and we will correct it.

Prove AI’s impact. Across your human and agent workforce.

Try Larridin

From $25,000 a year, annual contract.