Larridin Blog

What is AI Adoption?

Written by Floyd Smith | Feb 14, 2026

AI adoption is how deeply and broadly your organization actually uses AI — not just how many licenses you’ve bought.

AI adoption is the process by which an organization moves from experimenting with artificial intelligence tools to embedding them into daily workflows across teams, functions, and business units. It is not a single metric or a binary state. True AI adoption is multi-dimensional—spanning the tools employees use, how deeply they use them, and where across the organization usage is taking hold.

And what is the goal? Employee productivity, where AI is already making a difference (US Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis). Over time, output per employee is the key driver of profitability, economic growth, and improving living standards worldwide.

Larridin has created an AI Adoption Guide to help you implement AI effectively at your company, helping you to achieve measurable ROI, compounding over time, with your investment (Larridin’s 2026 State of Enterprise AI Report). This blog post provides an introduction to the topic and highlights from the report.

Access Larridin’s AI Adoption Guide

Why AI Adoption Matters in 2026

AI adoption has shifted from a technology initiative to a strategic imperative. The world’s most valuable companies are no longer asking whether employees should use AI—they are mandating it, incentivizing it, and tying it to performance.

Meta now evaluates every employee on “AI-driven impact” as part of formal performance reviews, with top performers earning bonuses of up to 200%. NVIDIA’s CEO has directed that every task possible should be automated with AI. Zapier achieved 97% company-wide adoption through bottom-up culture-building. Microsoft, Google, and Amazon have all sent the same signal: AI is no longer optional.

Yet despite this urgency, the accountability gap is stark. Only 1 in 5 AI investments delivers measurable ROI (Gartner), and 56% of CEOs report getting “nothing” from their AI adoption efforts (PwC’s 2026 Global CEO Survey). The gap between AI spending and AI outcomes is a measurement problem—and organizations that cannot measure adoption cannot close it.

If your leadership cannot answer key questions, such as: “How deeply has our organization adopted AI. Where are the gaps? How do we know?”—you have a strategic blind spot.

 

The Larridin AI Tool Classification (Three Axes)

Enterprise AI in 2026 is not one tool. It is an ecosystem of foundation models, AI-first products, AI-augmented features, vertical solutions, and homegrown systems. Making sense of this landscape requires classifying tools along three axes:

  1. Autonomy Level—Ranges from Agentic (tools that plan, execute, and deliver results independently) through AI-First (products where AI is the entire value proposition, such as ChatGPT or Midjourney) to AI-Augmented at high, medium, and low levels (existing products with varying degrees of AI integration, from Notion AI down to Slack’s AI summaries).
  2. Modality—What the tool produces and consumes: text, code, image, audio, video, or multimedia. A mature AI portfolio spans multiple modalities, not just chat.
  3. ScopeHorizontal tools serve any function or industry (ChatGPT, Claude). Vertical tools are domain-specific (Harvey for legal, Rad AI for radiology). Both matter for a complete adoption picture.

The classification matters because an organization where 80% of employees use only ChatGPT has a fundamentally different—and weaker—adoption profile than one where 60% use a diverse portfolio across autonomy levels, modalities, and scopes.

The Four Layers of Adoption Measurement

Measuring AI adoption effectively requires moving beyond login counts. Larridin’s framework operates across four progressive layers:

  • Layer 1: Usage—Are people showing up? DAU/WAU/MAU across all AI tools, activation rates, first-time vs. returning users.
  • Layer 2: Depth & Engagement—Is AI becoming a habit? Engagement scores, session patterns, habit formation signals, and where each user falls on the adoption spectrum.
  • Layer 3: Breadth—How wide is the tool portfolio? Number of distinct AI tools per person, cross-category usage, tool diversity across autonomy levels and modalities.
  • Layer 4: Segmentation—Where is adoption happening and where is it not? Breakdowns by team, hierarchy level, geography, tenure, job function, and business unit.

Each layer adds depth. Usage alone is dangerously incomplete; segmentation transforms adoption data from a dashboard metric into a management tool.

The Adoption Spectrum (User Categories)

Not all usage is equal. Your organization’s employees distribute across a spectrum:

  • Non-users—No engagement with AI tools
  • Explorers—Tried AI a few times, no habit formed
  • Regular users—Use AI multiple times per week for specific tasks
  • Power users—Extensive daily AI usage across workflows
  • AI-native—AI is the default way they think and work

Understanding this distribution is actionable. If 70% of your organization is stuck at “explorer,” you have a habit formation problem, not a deployment problem. Power users and AI-native employees are your champions—the internal advocates who can accelerate adoption for everyone else.

 

Common Misconceptions

“AI adoption = how many people use ChatGPT (or Copilot).” This is the most widespread misunderstanding. Measuring a single tool gives you a vendor-specific view, not an enterprise view. Your employees are using more AI than any single dashboard reveals—and the tools they use beyond your primary platform may be where the most value is created.

“We bought 10,000 licenses, so we’ve adopted AI.” License counts measure procurement, not adoption. A 10,000-seat Copilot deployment with 15% weekly active usage is not an adoption success—it is a spend optimization problem. Adoption is about active, sustained engagement, not seat allocation.

“We measured adoption last quarter, so we’re covered.” Adoption is a dynamic, evolving metric. Measuring it once or quarterly misses the trajectory entirely. Weekly and monthly trends reveal whether adoption is accelerating, plateauing, or declining—and whether your interventions are working. Treat adoption measurement as continuous infrastructure, not a point-in-time exercise.

"Agentic AI is all that counts." This is untrue, but directionally valuable. Agentic AI can handle entire workflows, and it should be an important part of your AI mix. At the same time, each type of AI has a valuable role in your repertory of solutions. Look at common workflows within each of your teams to see which can be automated entirely with (usually, agentic) AI. 

 

How It Connects

AI adoption does not exist in isolation. It is the foundation layer that connects to several related concepts across the AI execution intelligence landscape:

  • AI Proficiency measures how skilled your people are at using AI, while adoption measures whether and how much they use it. High adoption with low proficiency means people are using AI badly. You need both.
  • Unsanctioned AI (also known as “shadow AI”) is the hidden underside of adoption—employees using unsanctioned AI tools that IT cannot see. You cannot govern what you cannot measure, and adoption measurement is the foundation of shadow AI visibility.
  • AI Execution Intelligence is the broader discipline that encompasses adoption, proficiency, and impact measurement. Adoption data feeds into the execution intelligence layer that connects AI usage to business outcomes.

For a comprehensive treatment of adoption strategy, measurement frameworks, and organizational maturity models, see the full AI Adoption Guide.

 

Larridin is the AI execution intelligence platform that gives enterprises complete visibility into AI adoption, proficiency, and impact across every tool, team, and employee. If your leadership cannot answer “where are we on AI adoption?” with data, Larridin can fix that.